Subscribe now

The Full Story

Powder Point Bridge. The discussion was not a construction approval or appropriation. A MassDOT official, Marco Pereira, said that from the agency’s perspective, replacement is the only alternative. The agency’s maintenance estimate put the equivalent annual cost at approximately $66,000 a year over 50 years and $222,000 over 100 years.

Pereira said the design is at the 25% stage and that, even if the bridge were found historic, MassDOT would not be obliged to rehabilitate it given its condition. The town’s deadline to stop the project is roughly late March, before the job is advertised to contractors, he said. The current best case is a four-and-a-half-year project, which he said could be three and a half years only without environmental limits.

Asked whether a look-alike wooden bridge could get federal money, Pereira said it could not. On the repair approach promoted by timber engineer Dan Tingley, he said MassDOT found nothing wrong with the repairs, but a hydraulic analysis found the shallow piers subject to scour and the structure not resilient against projected sea level rise.

We cannot spend money on that. We cannot. That does not mean you cannot.
— Marco Pereira, P.E., Supervising Project Manager, Major Projects, MassDOT – Highway Division 2:20:49

Pereira said delays not tied to historic review would put this year’s funding at risk and require reprogramming through the Metropolitan Planning Organization, where the project would compete with others.

Residents push back. Derek Bennett with Save Powder Point Bridge, Inc. called the replacement a nearly $200 million project and asked who authorized pursuing replacement over rehabilitation, and at what public meeting. He also asked who had independently evaluated the town’s long-term financial exposure.

Sheila Lynch-Benttinen asked for a hybrid design with concrete and steel piers and a wooden top, and said a congressional office had said a state bridge engineer could not set a funding deadline. The MassDOT official said the regional planning organization and colleagues had confirmed the understanding that unobligated federal funds get reprogrammed, and asked for the question in writing. Peter Dalton from the Shellfish Advisory Committee said Duxbury Bay produced $8 million in oysters and that growers fear construction silt and lost business.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The capital budget was on the agenda for discussion only. Superintendent Danielle Klingaman, presenting the list, said the committee had heard the full presentation at its previous meeting and that the vote is scheduled for the Nov. 4 meeting. The slide on screen showed only the requests the district ranked most imperative, totaling $2.125 million.

Technology made up most of the list. Klingaman said the core network switch was the most important technology ask because it controls the entire district’s network. Classroom audio systems are running years past their recommended useful life and are especially important for students with accommodations, she said, while projectors and displays at the middle and high school building are beyond their useful life, with some replacement parts no longer available. Chromebook and staff device leases are standing items.

On the facilities side, the list includes a mower for grounds work and furniture: library and team-area furniture at the middle and high school, plus tables, chairs and desks at the elementary schools. The superintendent said furniture has not been prioritized in recent years and the district is now dealing with broken pieces.

There’s such a huge list of capital needs in the community that we could absolutely triple that for this year in terms of painting and other things that we’d like to address.
— Danielle Klingaman, Superintendent 55:54

The request still has to go through the town’s fiscal advisory review and be weighed against other departments’ capital requests, she said.

Chair Matt Gambino asked whether the list represents 20% of the schools’ actual capital needs. Director of Business & Finance Lisa Freeley confirmed it, saying one-year needs exceed $10 million and that the total is significantly higher across the district’s five-year plan.

Laurel Deacon used the discussion to address questions the member said have been popping up about the operating override.

She said the override paid for specific operating expenses the schools laid out and did not address deferred maintenance, and that capital requests from last year also went unfunded and continue to roll forward. Klingaman agreed that the override did not address capital needs.

Jenna Wechsler said residents may also ask why the district is spending money on the Alden School while a building project is planned, noting the project is a long way out and the building has to keep operating. Klingaman added that the Massachusetts School Building Authority expects districts seeking state reimbursement to show they are maintaining their buildings, and said the Alden School has had weather-related leaks.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The draft covenant posted in the board’s packet, from Old Myrtle Street Realty Trust trustee Susan J. Curtis, makes the developer solely responsible for maintaining Old Road and its drainage and utilities, including snow and ice removal. The town keeps public use of the way and will maintain a planned water line. The obligation runs with the four lots. A review by engineer Patrick G. Brennan describes a 751-foot dead end with a 14-foot travel way.

Michael McGee stepped away before discussion, citing no immediate conflict but past campaign support from Curtis.

Town counsel said the final version, handed out at the meeting, added a reference to the certified town meeting vote on the way’s public status, barred work beyond Station 7-51 on the plan and required the covenant to be recorded before any work begins. Selectboard member Brian Glennon sent town counsel the questions and edits behind those changes.

It was really the two big things I had was the limit of work and confirming that this, in fact, is a public way based upon something before us, and that we as a board are not certifying it as a public way.
— Brian Glennon, Selectboard 1:31:18

The trust’s attorney said the town clerk certified records of an 1812 town meeting vote as true public records on July 7, 2025, and that the town asked for a plan and a covenant guaranteeing it would never pay to maintain the road. Town counsel said the vote describes a road of about 1,000 feet that very likely is this one, though confirming it would take title research. Counsel added that signing would not bind the town to accept the way as public if it is not.

How the existing gravel road was built is disputed. An abutter said a photograph dated Aug. 12 shows the stone wall being moved and that the timeline the board had been given was wrong. The trust’s attorney said the work began in June 2025 and the building commissioner deemed it lawful; Glennon noted that finding assumed the way was private. The town’s public works director, Sheila Sgarzi, said neighbors called Aug. 15, 2025, to report that a contractor had torn through a drain line, and that the line, in the North Street right of way, was believed repaired but no street opening permit was obtained.

Glennon said questions about the earlier work could be set aside for now. After the vote, Glennon asked the board to confirm it had not discussed or absolved anything that may have happened in the past.

Carole Smith, a North Street resident, said a drainage easement carries water under the new gravel road and asked that the covenant acknowledge it. Sgarzi offered to run a camera through the drain to confirm it is intact. Glennon said the board was not adjudicating any easements.

The abutter asked that the abutters’ attorney, who was not present, get a chance to review late filings and respond, possibly next week. The trust’s attorney called that a delay tactic that would keep the trust from paving or installing its water line this year. The abutter said the request was not meant to delay. Selectboard member Cynthia Ladd Fiorini said the board had already given abutters two weeks and that remaining questions about other matters did not concern the covenant. Glennon was reluctant to continue the matter again, saying solicited comments raised nothing new about the document.

A second town attorney said the covenant waives no regulatory requirements, so wetland work still must go before the Conservation Commission. Town counsel called the covenant as protective of the town as it can be and said it bars this owner from extending the road but does not bind future boards. The motion passed unanimously with the three members present, the presiding member announced.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The committee’s vote is an endorsement, not an appropriation. Ken LaRose, treasurer of the Duxbury Youth Soccer Association’s executive committee board, said the group was meeting with its key stakeholders before filing for Community Preservation funding, looking for alignment, feedback or a stop sign from the committee if it objected.

The group’s president, James Chandler, said more than 900 children from pre-K through eighth grade are signed up. About 350 fifth- through eighth-graders play travel games and practice on the Ray Coppens fields, and about 300 pre-K and kindergarten players use the complex for mini soccer.

LaRose said years of heavy use have left the surface so uneven that coaches hold their breath watching players run, for fear of a hidden depression.

It’s borderline unsafe, primarily because of how uneven the surface is.
— Ken LaRose, Duxbury Youth Soccer Treasurer 8:20

The project covers about 177,000 square feet. The plan is to strip the grass, re-soil and laser-grade the fields, address the irrigation and re-sod, producing a new playing surface. A proposal the group commissioned last May priced the work at $336,000; a contingency for cost escalation, added on advice the group received, brings the request to $372,000. The group also committed to raise at least $12,000 a year for maintenance beyond the DPW’s general upkeep, and expects six to eight years of use before the fields need work again.

Work would ideally begin around July 1, after the school year. The fields would close for the summer and reopen for school use, including recess, but soccer would stay off them for a full year while the sod takes hold. The group plans to rent fields in neighboring communities and seek time on the high school’s artificial turf.

Asked whether a possible limit on town water for lawns could affect the project, LaRose said the irrigation draws from a well, which was confirmed in the room, and called lighting a possible later phase. Member Jenna Wechsler said uneven fields are a safety concern for athletes, and another thanked the group for laying out a project the member described as one piece of a much larger issue for the town.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The moratorium would halt new hookups to the town water system, not construction, Chair Amy MacNab said in a statement. The draft goes to the Water and Sewer Advisory Board for comment, no testimony was taken Monday, and the hearing will continue Nov. 9, MacNab said.

The town exceeded its Water Management Act permit limit by about 18.25 million gallons in 2025 alone, MacNab said. Irrigation rules and this summer’s watering restrictions have it projected to stay within its permitted withdrawal in 2026 for the first time in decades, but droughts are growing more frequent and filtering out PFAS will be costly, MacNab said.

When faced with a serious problem, the first thing we need to do is stop making it worse. We need to stop digging the hole before we figure out how to climb out of it.
— Amy MacNab, Selectboard Chair 46:41

The pause would buy about a year to verify assumptions and build a long-term plan, MacNab said, adding that town counsel had found it appropriate and legal and that connections would resume once it lifts.

The commissioners left this summer’s outdoor watering restrictions in place without a vote. Watering is allowed once a week under the current Level 1 drought, and the water and sewer superintendent expects the state drought task force to lift all restrictions when it meets Thursday. Member Fernando Guitart argued the ban and the moratorium are tied, asking how the town could pause new connections while letting consumption climb. MacNab agreed, saying the only time in 20 years the town met its permit was when outdoor watering was barred entirely.

Earlier, during open forum, MacNab read a statement that the board, after hearing from constituents, has determined it is in the town’s best interest to acquire the property known as Miramar, calling it essential to protecting drinking water, groundwater recharge, open space and natural resources. The town will begin efforts to acquire it and will likely bring a request to Town Meeting soon, the statement said. MacNab said the matter was not up for discussion Monday and that more would follow.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The letter arrived by email around 5 p.m. from a U.S. Department of Transportation environmental program manager, Town Manager René Read said. It responds to two requests from the group Save Powder Point Bridge: to be named a Section 106 consulting party, and to have the Federal Highway Administration forward a request for a determination of eligibility to the Keeper of the National Register. The agency accepted the group as a consulting party on Aug. 18. It refused the second request.

It is our determination the existing Powder Point Bridge over Duxbury Bay located in Duxbury is not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
— Federal Highway Administration letter 1:39:09

The letter says the original 1891 bridge was eligible for listing but was heavily damaged by fire on June 11, 1985, demolished and replaced in 1986 by a new timber bridge of a different design. It describes the current bridge as having major structural deficiencies, particularly in its timber piles, as weight posted at four tons, and as being in exceedingly poor engineering condition. It found insufficient documentation that the bridge qualifies as a traditional cultural place under Department of the Interior standards, and said its finding agrees with a Nov. 22, 2024, eligibility opinion letter between MassDOT and the Massachusetts Historical Commission.

The letter leaves an opening. It invites the group to give MassDOT additional documentation in the ongoing Section 106 process and says the agency would be willing to reconsider or go to the keeper of the NRHP if sufficient evidence emerges. Read said a contact reached by phone explained that the group now has standing, the federal government does not consider the bridge historic, and it would be up to the group to go to the keeper directly. The keeper has made no determination, the town manager said, and the state transportation process continues.

Chair Amy MacNab asked why the board should not submit a request to the keeper itself to get a determination and move the project forward.

That’s a change in direction from where the Board currently stands. Because right now the Board back in September decided to move forward with the MassDOT project.
— René Read, Town Manager 1:45:11

Board members differed on what to do next. Fernando Guitart called the letter ambiguous and wanted to ask Read’s contact directly how to reach a final answer. Michael McGee said the matter was not on the agenda, that further deliberation was premature and that it should be scheduled with room for the public. MacNab asked that it return in about two weeks.

Read also said a list of questions about 12 pages long from the Powder Point Bridge Advisory Committee went well beyond the committee’s scope. Brian Glennon asked for an overall status update in a couple of weeks, noting the town is still paying every year to keep the bridge open and must eventually decide whether to stay with MassDOT or pursue rehabilitation of the existing structure.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The adopted version reflected changes from a summer workshop. The superintendent said the mission, vision and values were unchanged, but the “theory of action” became a “theory of change,” intended outcomes were rewritten so they no longer read as actions, key performance indicators were made measurable, and summaries were moved to follow each initiative. Language on executive functioning was added at a committee member’s request.

“The strategic plan is the north star for the district when we’re looking at how we’re creating our budget,” said Superintendent Danielle Klingaman. School Committee member Kathryn Marshall said many of the plan’s indicators call for improvement and asked that presentations include a baseline to measure against. Dr. Erin Wiesehahn, Assistant Superintendent, said much of the first year’s work is setting those baselines.

Dr. Klingaman also presented a draft year-one action plan, which the committee will take up at its next meeting. It includes building “portrait of a learner” profiles for each school; end-of-course assessments at the high school, now that MCAS is no longer a graduation requirement; a new AI and technology committee that will seek parent, community and committee members; an audit of health, SEL and executive functioning instruction; a look at homework and grading; a “portrait of an educator”; and more non-evaluative coaching walkthroughs. The superintendent said the district’s 183-day calendar has cut professional development time, and that the district wants a five-to-10-year capital plan for its buildings beyond the Alden School.

The committee approved its own 2026-2027 goals by voice vote after trimming a performance indicator and adding language on monitoring MASC legislative updates. It approved the superintendent’s and assistant superintendent’s goals, also by voice vote. Those four goals commit the district to establishing baselines and documenting growth for students with IEPs, 504 plans, English learners and low-income students by June 2027, and to completing year-one planning and feasibility milestones for building projects. The committee voted 5-0 to approve its 2026-2027 agenda calendar, which Chair Matt Gambino had mapped against the strategic plan.

District curriculum supervisors presented 2025-2026 results. On i-Ready math, about 78% of students in grades 1 through 8 met grade-level expectations, flat for three years. Chandler and Alden were at about 83% and 85%, while the middle school held at about 68% or 69%, which Dr. Wiesehahn called an area for growth. At the middle school, 25% of students with IEPs reached the math benchmark last year, up from 18% the year before. Reading held around 80% district-wide. At the high school, 375 students were enrolled in AP classes and 84% scored 3 or higher; 43 students earned the Seal of Biliteracy, 15 with distinction. All eight English learners met their state target, and four met exit criteria.

Diane Mehegan, Curriculum Supervisor World Language & English Learner Supervisor, said 14 middle school students with perfect or near-perfect MCAS scores had been excused from the spring i-Ready diagnostic, which affects the reported results. The elementary grades will move to an updated edition of their math program, and the middle school is in its third year of Illustrative Math. Asked by Gambino whether that program is working, Mike Murray, STEM Curriculum Supervisor, said it is.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The easement town meeting approved for the new seawall permits nothing inside it at any time of year. The policy the board adopted Monday carves out a seasonal window when shorefront owners may use that strip and makes an exception for beach stairs, while requiring decking, fences and other temporary items to come out the rest of the time. Four owners asked the board to soften it. The board declined.

Brendan McLaughlin joining online asked for a single added sentence letting anything that comes apart quickly and is not fastened to the ground or the wall stay year-round, under the same 48-hour removal notice the stairs carry. Paul Donovan called the fixed date range arbitrary and proposed tying removal to scheduled town work instead. Michael Sheehan said the policy sets out no clear path to getting beach stairs approved before the deadline. Rocco Piccirillo put the cost of an aluminum structure built on the building department’s advice at $15,600, and said it cannot come down in two weeks.

The vice chair proposed abandoning the policy rather than keep renegotiating it.

We’re trying to be flexible. We’re trying to meet you halfway, but you want everything, right?
— Vice Chair Fernando Guitart 2:03:59

Chair Amy MacNab answered that dropping the policy would mean every set of stairs comes down.

MacNab defended the seasonal window as the product of a long negotiation with the DPW director, who had questioned granting owners any rights inside a town easement, and said the board can revisit the terms after a season 2:06:15. Members then floated extra time for the first year: November 1, then October 31, then October 30, then five weeks. The motion that carried approved the draft policy as presented and set no date. It passed on a voice vote.

The board also voted to sign a 25-year intermunicipal agreement for a regional household hazardous waste depot at Hanover’s transfer station. The project needs 12 South Shore municipalities before construction bids can be awarded, and three had signed as of Monday; South Shore Recycling Coop Executive Director Claire Galkowski told the board the project fails if all 12 do not. MacNab said the handout put Duxbury’s current cost at $8,600 a year against $11,000 under the agreement, an increase of about $2,400. Duxbury would go from six collection days a year to seven at one fixed site, open in summer and winter as well as spring and fall. Member Brian Glennon confirmed a town may withdraw at the end of any fiscal year on eight months’ notice.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Finance Director Mary MacKinnon put it plainly: “That $3 million is not going to go as far as we would like it to.”

The pension number moved against the town without warning. Plymouth County Retirement Association met in August and voted to stretch its funding schedule again — out to 2032, having already pushed it from 2029 to 2031 last year. It also backed off a discount rate MacKinnon described as aggressive for many years, and revised its salary-growth assumptions. Between them, those changes produce an increase of at least 9.75 percent in Duxbury’s assessment.

MacKinnon said full funding would eventually free several million dollars a year in budget capacity, and that every extension moves that further away.

Health insurance carries at least a 6 percent placeholder. The town is self-insured and will not know its real cost until renewal next spring. The debt figure is firmer: $245,000 more in fiscal 2028 for exempt debt on the DPW facility, the seawall project and the Alden feasibility study.

The forecast deliberately leaves out the largest question in front of the town. No provision is made for the Powder Point Bridge in any form — repair, rehabilitation or reconstruction — because, MacKinnon said, she has no idea which way the board will vote or when any of it would hit the budget. Nothing is assumed for Miramar or any other large 40B either, on the reasoning that such projects take years to move through permitting and may land outside the forecast window entirely.

What the town does rely on is its own residents. The tax levy funds 72.3 percent of a roughly $106 million general fund operating budget, and 96.5 percent of that levy is borne by residential taxpayers. State aid covers about 9 percent. Duxbury’s share of the state’s $6.7 billion Chapter 70 pool is 0.12 percent — and MacKinnon noted that 25 communities take two-thirds of all state aid, leaving the remaining 263 to divide the rest.

MacKinnon was careful to label the capital list raw. The $74 million in fiscal 2028 requests has not been prioritized, vetted or discussed with departments. “I think it goes without saying we are not going to be able to afford $74 million of requests next year,” she said, and asked the board to hold the number in mind while it makes the bigger decisions ahead.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Of the $44.3 million appropriated, the district expended just over $43 million outright and carried $497,000 forward in purchase order encumbrances. Director of Business & Finance Lisa Freeley walked the committee through the variances by cost center.

Curriculum and instruction finished with $818,000 available, from salary, contracted service and supply savings. Tuition programs came in under because two costly out-of-district special education placements never materialized — and because the district again prepaid $247,000 of next year’s out-of-district tuition, which state law permits up to three months ahead. Administration returned $57,000.

Those cushions absorbed overruns elsewhere. Other school services ran over on athletics and out-of-district transportation. Maintenance and operations ran over on energy, after a year Freeley described as very cold and very hot while school was in session, plus reactive and proactive repairs across the district. Fixed charges ran roughly $36,000 over on unplanned separation payouts from late retirements and resignations.

The district also drew two Fair Share supplemental earmarks it had never received before — $25,000 toward the Alden feasibility study and $70,000 unrestricted, which administrators intend to put toward a capital need not yet identified. Both must be applied for through a grant portal, with an October deadline.

Because the special education reserve is at its maximum, the returned money cannot top it up. It is certified as free cash, and the district competes for it through the ordinary capital process, bringing a prioritized list to the committee in October.

“It’s a relief in a challenging couple of fiscal years that we’ve had to be able to return funding. And in years like this, even though that’s been the trend, we are still just really cautious.” — Superintendent Danielle Klingaman

The caution has two sources. A contract settled in the spring came in above the budgeted rate, and the summer’s hiring came in above projections — not above what departing staff earned, Freeley said, but above what the roles were budgeted at. The district has been filling niche positions — French, Latin, high school physics — with experienced educators rather than early-career ones.

“Usually you can plan on a $25,000 to $30,000 savings when someone retires and you hire someone, and we just, we’re not seeing that as the trend.” — Superintendent Danielle Klingaman

Freeley said the district is starting the year with tight position control and is not discussing a budget freeze now, though a December check is not unusual. She also flagged that the district may ask to tap the special education reserve this year — not out of need, but to stay under the maximum balance it is allowed to hold.

Chapter 70 aid came in above what the town budgeted, by roughly $218,000 to $238,000. Because Duxbury holds an early town meeting and budgets conservatively, that money goes to the town’s free cash rather than to the schools.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

What was scheduled as an open public hearing to evaluate Verizon New England Inc.’s cable television renewal license quickly turned into a class in municipal oversight when the Selectboard discovered that no physical contract or packet materials had been delivered to the board or made available to the public.

Miranda Cecil, an associate attorney with town counsel KP Law appearing remotely on behalf of lead counsel Nicole Costanzo, presented an executive summary of the negotiated renewal terms. Under the proposed five-year agreement, Duxbury would secure the maximum allowable 5% of Verizon’s gross annual revenue to support local public, educational, and government (PEG) access channels, alongside an upfront capital grant of $90,000 paid out over five annual installments of $18,000. By comparison, the town’s 2020 renewal provided a $45,000 capital grant alongside the same 5% revenue agreement.

Town Manager René Read interjected early in the presentation to note that neither town officials nor residents had access to the contract text. “The problem is the public doesn’t know because the board doesn’t know either,” Read noted, recommending that the board defer action until complete documentation could be distributed.

Board members voiced sharp concerns over the broader structural shift toward cord-cutting and streaming services. Member Michael McGee emphasized that the 5% revenue cut is shrinking in real value as households abandon traditional cable packages for online apps. While Cecil noted that the $90,000 capital grant is not tied to subscriber volume—making it a more stable funding stream—McGee requested historical and regional comparisons from surrounding South Shore towns to confirm whether the offer was truly competitive.

Vice-Chair Fernando Guitart pressed legal counsel on how competition operates in a market where Comcast also provides cable service in Duxbury. Cecil explained that under the Federal Cable Communications Act, cable licensing is not an open competitive bidding process; instead, terms secured in the Verizon agreement establish an ascertainment baseline that Comcast (whose current license expires in 2031) will theoretically be pressured to match or exceed.

Selectboard member Brian Glennon highlighted the legal hearing notice published in the Duxbury Clipper, which explicitly stated the hearing’s purpose: assessing whether Verizon is in full compliance with its current license and identifying the town’s future cable-related needs. When discussion turned to the scope of public testimony, Guitart insisted that a Verizon corporate representative be required to attend the continued hearing in person.

“[I]f people are going to be now fully understanding what this is the opportunity is, I request that we have a Verizon representative present in the room so they can take any feedback from the public directly and respond to it...” — Fernando Guitart, Vice-Chair

Counsel agreed to coordinate attendance with Verizon, and the board voted 5-0 to continue the hearing to September 14 at 6:45 p.m.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The joint appointment process, required under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 41, Section 11, brought forward three qualified candidates to fill the seat vacated until the next municipal election: Priscilla Nissi, a 25-year veteran Duxbury educator; Jenna Wechsler, an attorney in juvenile court and former college educator; and Carol-Ann “Callie” Smith, a former independent/charter school Latin teacher and active PTA leader.

During a structured interview covering fiscal management following the recent Proposition 2½ override, technology integration, and district governance, each candidate outlined their vision for the schools. Nissi emphasized her deep institutional knowledge and classroom perspective, Smith spotlighted special education equity, communication, and community engagement through new media, and Wechsler underscored her background in educational law, mediation, and child advocacy.

Following public questioning, the boards engaged in a transparent debate. Selectboard Member Brian Glennon and School Committee Chair Matt Gambino initially supported Nissi for her ability to immediately navigate district operations without a ramp-up period. However, concerns were raised regarding potential budget-related recusals due to family ties in the district. Selectboard member Michael McGee and other board members championed Wechsler, highlighting her legal acumen, dispute resolution background, and valedictorian finish at New England Law Boston. In an initial straw poll, Wechsler secured a 4-vote plurality against 3 votes for Nissi and 2 for Smith, leading to a unanimous joint roll call vote formally appointing Wechsler to the seat.

“We have to come in prepared, come in confident with our experience that we bring from other areas of our life and just be ready to hit the ground running.” [01:39:05] — Jenna Wechsler

The meeting shifted to long-term infrastructure and municipal policy, centering on recommendations presented by Ed Mayo, Chair of the Powder Point Bridge Advisory Committee. The town is actively balancing an anticipated $172 million state-funded MassDOT replacement against community desires to pursue a timber rehabilitation alternative. Mayo outlined critical next steps, including requesting a side-by-side lifecycle cost analysis from MassDOT, independent long-term maintenance evaluations, and consolidated environmental impact reviews for timber versus steel/concrete options.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The future of Duxbury’s iconic Powder Point Bridge dominated the August 3 meeting, following a MassDOT presentation held the previous week. Board members and residents expressed significant concern regarding the proposed timeline, environmental impacts, and economic consequences for the town.

Selectboard member Michael McGee opened the board’s discussion by highlighting the severity of MassDOT’s anticipated four-and-a-half-year complete bridge closure. McGee cautioned that a multi-year closure, coupled with a full detour route through Cox Corner, would heavily disrupt local businesses, Saquish homeowners, and beach sticker revenues, while putting immense strain on beach replenishment programs.

“What gives me great pause with this project is the economic impacts of a four and a half plus year closure, because it would be a complete closure of the bridge for those four and a half years.” — Michael McGee

Board member Brian Glennon underscored the lack of financial clarity regarding long-term maintenance costs for the state-proposed structure. Glennon noted that while advocate opinion is sharply divided between accepting a state-funded replacement and rehabilitating the existing wooden bridge, clear numbers on post-construction maintenance over a 75-to-100-year lifespan remain missing.

Vice-Chair Fernando Guitart pointed out that two upcoming critical decision points will heavily dictate the town’s options: the outcome of MassDOT’s ongoing geotechnical scour study and the ruling on the Section 106 historical eligibility review, expected around October. Chair Amy MacNab emphasized that the town must avoid being boxed into a “point of no return” prior to MassDOT targeting project procurement in early 2027.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Municipal administrative errors took center stage when the board, convening as Water and Sewer Commissioners, reviewed an astronomical $42,239.88 water bill issued to West Street homeowner Nigel Bird. Water and Sewer Superintendent Mark Cloud explained that following an investigation, town staff discovered the home’s original meter reading had recorded incorrectly and dropped to zero years ago following radio replacements, inadvertently tallying 22 years of cumulative town water usage onto a single recent bill. Bird detailed his five-week ordeal performing forensic accounting across two decades of land records to prove he had not consumed 4 million gallons of water—equivalent to filling 200 swimming pool. The board unanimously granted an abatement reducing his balance to $892.02.

“If you’re going to give somebody a $43,000 bill, you’ve got to be damn sure that they used that water in all the history... It turns out it was ultimately a town problem.” [01:07:08] — Nigel Bird, Resident

A second abatement request on Bay Road involving 451,000 gallons of unaccounted water usage was tabled for further data collection after homeowner Rebecca Marani presented quarterly bills showing usage spiked drastically prior to a meter replacement in December 2025 and immediately normalized thereafter. Board members expressed concern over recurring townwide meter and radio malfunctions, prompting plans for a comprehensive departmental review with DPW leadership.

Public comment opened with sharp exchanges regarding the future of the Powder Point Bridge. Resident Alicia Babcock challenged the Selectboard’s timeline, calling for immediate action to file a Section 106 historical preservation review and support community efforts against MassDOT’s demolition and replacement proposal. Town Manager René Read clarified that a scheduled advisory recommendation was postponed pending a formal response from MassDOT addressing nine specific technical and financial inquiries submitted by the town. Resident Dick Brennan countered that the board should take all necessary time to evaluate the long-term financial consequences for taxpayers.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The Selectboard received a high-stakes briefing from Alston Potts, a project manager at Apex Companies, detailing a comprehensive hydraulic and chemical breakdown of Duxbury’s water grid. The engineering data highlighted an alarming disparity between winter and summer operations. During the winter, the Lakeshore Well remains mostly offline—limiting local exposure—but surging seasonal demands, driven almost entirely by automated lawn irrigation and swimming pool refills, force the town to lean heavily on the contaminated well to ensure fire protection and maintain tap pressure.

The technical findings ignited a fierce debate regarding transparency and immediate remediation. Selectboard members expressed deep frustration that local residents are unknowingly consuming water containing elevated carcinogens that violate the 2029 limit. The board collectively dismissed utilizing multi-year localized averages to mask the threat, demanding that real-time information and immediate household alerts dictate the town’s response. However, water officials noted that total isolation or shutdown of the Lakeshore Well is currently impossible without catastrophic drops in grid capacity. Local advocates also pointed out that neighbor town grids, including sections of the Gurnet area fed by Marshfield, are confronting similarly elevated chemical metrics.

"[The model shows that] 200 residences right now... is over four parts per trillion... We are delivering water that is not compliant... We've got to find alternatives." — Selectboard Member Fernando Guitart

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The emergency session was called to address an unplanned shake-up on the Duxbury School Committee. At the start of the meeting, the committee addressed immediate leadership needs by electing member Laurel Deacon to serve as Vice Chair. The position was filled via a quick 4-0 roll-call vote following an abbreviated nomination process.

The primary focus of the meeting, however, quickly turned to navigating filling an unexpected seat. Committee Chair Matt Gambino clarified that neither state law nor Duxbury town bylaws enshrine a repeatable application intake process for mid-term board vacancies. Instead, Massachusetts General Law Chapter 41, Section 11 dictates only the final selection method: a majority vote of both the Selectboard and the remaining School Committee members during an officially noticed joint meeting.

To bridge this procedural gap, Gambino presented three strategic options: amend permanent school district policy, execute a customized “one-off” process for this specific vacancy, or defer the responsibility entirely to the Selectboard. The committee quickly rejected a permanent policy overhaul as being too time-consuming for a summer timeline, opting instead to build a streamlined, one-time roadmap.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The standing-room-only meeting opened with an introduction from Alicia Babcock, a representative of the non-profit organization Save Powder Point Bridge, Inc. (SPPB). Babcock explained that SPPB sponsored the independent evaluation by Wood Research and Development (WRD) under a temporary license granted by the Selectboard. Dr. Dan Tingley, WRD’s Executive Director and Senior Design Engineer, led the presentation, utilizing electronic stress-wave technology to evaluate the bridge’s timber elements from the inside out.

Tingley’s data challenged previous reports regarding the structural degradation of the 134-year-old crossing. While MassDOT officials previously expressed explicit opposition to maintaining a wooden structure, Tingley clarified that the physical deterioration is confined almost exclusively to a 3.8-foot warfare zone within the tidal splash zone. Crucially, the internal cores of the piles and all segments below the seabed remain entirely unaffected due to a lack of oxygen.

The report sharply criticized previous repair efforts, specifically the fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tight-wrapping and grout encapsulation implemented around 2013. Tingley demonstrated that moisture absorption caused the high-density hardwood piles to swell, creating localized hoop stresses up to 164,000 psi. This structural pressure shattered the wrapping materials and crushed the exterior wood fiber, accelerating decay rather than preventing it. “The best thing you could do for those wraps right today for that bridge, take them all off,” Tingley stated.

To rectify the splash-zone damage, Tingley proposed using localized “Dutchman’s patches” (retaining the healthy core while replacing the outer shell) and segment posting with fixed-end moment (FEM) connections. This methodology would restore the structure to an overall state rating of 1 or 2, boosting load capacity while completely bypassing the need to shut down the bridge to traffic during construction.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The meeting opened with a brief executive session before entering an open segment that immediately highlighted the intersection of school policy and student life. During public comment, Alden School fourth-grader Kenzie Doble made a sophisticated presentation urging the committee to reject a rumored ban on Kindle e-readers on school buses, calculating that a 15-minute daily bus read equates to 45 hours of learning over a school year.

The primary operational focus of the night quickly shifted to the district’s athletic financial health. Athletic Director Jeff Maidment and a specialized athletic task force presented data showing that while student sports participation remains remarkably high at nearly 70%, overall high school enrollment has declined 16% since 2016. This contraction, combined with lower gate receipts and steep inflationary pressures on equipment—exacerbated by recent supply chain tariffs—has left the athletic department facing an average annual structural shortfall of $167,000.

To bridge this gap without reducing teams or cutting programs, the committee took two immediate legislative steps. First, they approved a structured hike in student-athlete user fees starting in the 2027–2028 school year, raising standard seasonal fees from $250 to $300 and ice hockey fees from $400 to $500, while adjusting the family cap to equal five user fees.

“The cost to operate an athletic program is significantly higher than it was even just five or six years ago... We have to be proactive.” — Jeff Maidment, Athletic Director

Second, the committee greenlit a commercial advertising pilot program designed by task force member and sports marketing executive Graham Nelson. The initiative will place up to 10 tasteful commercial banners across fields and courts to generate an estimated $35,000 in its first year. Nelson emphasized that unlike standard outsourced platforms that claim up to 60% of profits, this pilot will be managed locally so 100% of revenue goes directly into the athletic revolving fund to cover equipment, officials, and travel.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The sudden policy shift takes Duxbury from a two-day restricted watering schedule down to zero allowed days for standard lawn irrigation. Water Superintendent Mark Cloud briefed the board that the Massachusetts Drought Management Task Force met earlier in the day, voting unanimously to escalate the region to a Level 2 Significant Drought due to prolonged dry conditions. Under state permit guidelines, the town has a strict 14-day window to comply with state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) enforcement mandates.

While automatic sprinklers and hoses left running on lawns are entirely restricted, the board carved out limited exemptions for public health, safety, and specific economic operations. Residents may still water vegetable gardens and livestock. Commercial operations like plant nurseries and golf courses can continue highly restricted watering to maintain minimal business functions, and local venues may utilize handheld hoses or drip irrigation to preserve event spaces.

Furthermore, Selectboard members clarified that personal flower pots and plantings can still be watered using a standard handheld hose device equipped with an automatic shutoff nozzle. New lawn construction or stabilization following the replacement or repair of a Title V septic system is also permitted irrigation access. However, members noted that a pre-existing municipal moratorium on connecting new irrigation systems to town water means very few homes should qualify under the new construction clause.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The Selectboard meeting, chaired in person by Vice-Chair Fernando Guitart while Chair Amy MacNab participated remotely due to illness, centered almost entirely on the implementation of special assessments for the newly constructed Duxbury Beach seawall. Finance Director Mary MacKinnon opened the presentation by outlining the fiscal framework of the project. The total construction expenditures for Phase 2 reached $14.776 million. After factoring in a $3 million Coastal Zone Management (CZM) grant secured by the town, the net project cost sat at $11.7 million.

Per the explicit terms voted under Article 13 of the March 2023 Annual Town Meeting and a subsequent Proposition 2 1/2 debt exclusion, the town is responsible for 75% ($8.8 million) of the cost, while the remaining 25% ($2.94 million) must be levied directly onto the benefited properties through betterments.

To distribute the $2.94 million, town officials duplicated the tiered mathematical formula established during Phase 1 of the seawall project in 2018:

• Tier 1 (Directly Abutting): Responsible for 70% of the total betterment pool ($2.06 million), distributed across 47 properties based strictly on linear beach frontage.

• Tier 2 (Second Row): Responsible for 17% of the cost pool, split equally among 28 parcels, resulting in a flat assessment of $17,875.60 per property.

• Tier 3 (Third Row): Responsible for 8% of the pool split among fewer homes, yielding a flat $19,650 assessment.

• Tier 4 (Fourth Row): Responsible for the remaining 5%.

The meeting grew contentious as MacKinnon introduced three specific modifications made to the assessment ledger since the previous Friday. Two small, vacant, and undevelopable parcels valued at $600 and $8,000 were entirely exempted from the Tier 2 roll because the flat $17,875 assessment would unconstitutionally exceed the properties’ actual values. Additionally, a coastal parcel owned by the Najarian family was removed from Tier 1 after recorded DPW easement plans proved the new wall did not actually extend in front of their land.

These late adjustments triggered an hour of sharp criticism from the audience. Resident Geralyn McShane of Gurnet Road fiercely objected to her property being classified as Tier 1 frontage. McShane argued that because her beachfront parcel is vacant land separated from her home by a road, it receives no structural protection from the wall. “I have no house. The water comes over... the marsh is our issue, not the ocean. So we should not be penalized,” McShane protested. Selectboard member Brian Glennon counter-argued that shifting properties between tiers on the fly would create a cascading financial burden on the remaining 27 people in those zones and urged uniform adherence to the established map.

Read more