Subscribe now

The Full Story

The evening’s sharpest exchange was not over the largest number. It was over $300,000.

Article 8 would fund title research, appraisals, legal fees and surveys needed to move six Shallow Pond Estates roads — Andrew’s Way, Barbara’s Way, Donna Drive, Kathleen Drive, Penny Lane and Shallow Pond Lane — toward acceptance as public ways. The board had previously structured it as a borrowing. Golden moved to amend it to allow the town to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, accept gifts, or borrow.

Canty was the lone vote against, both on the amendment and on the article itself.

“There has not been a case made for why this is something that residents of West Plymouth, Buttermilk Bay, Cedarville, North Plymouth, why all of them should be having to pay additional funding to take what is a private neighborhood’s roads on as a public liability.” — Kevin Canty

He tied the vote directly to the town’s finances, noting Plymouth sits below its own free cash policy thresholds, faces contract negotiations with employees and unresolved costs at Memorial Hall, and may be two to three years from an operational override. Accepting depreciated private roads, he argued, adds both a one-time cost and a permanent maintenance obligation. “This is not in the interest of the 65,000 residents of Plymouth,” he said. “It may be in the interest of the 400 or so residents of this neighborhood.”

Quintal and Iaquinto both grounded their support in the 40B development at the rear of the neighborhood. Iaquinto called herself “reluctantly in support,” saying the development’s presence is “not the town’s fault” but is the reason the situation is unlike other unaccepted roads. Keohan argued the neighborhood has paid taxes throughout and that the town has a documented history of prioritizing those roads.

The capital article drew no such division. The finance director presented nine projects totaling $8.4 million — roughly $6.9 million from the general fund and $1.5 million from the water enterprise fund — recommended for funding through $435,370.40 in free cash, $7.9 million in borrowing, $137,500 from the environmental affairs fund and $8,414.60 from a prior article. Because two awarded grants reimburse the town after it spends, net borrowing falls to about $4.6 million. She confirmed to Golden that both grants are already awarded, not pending, and that water enterprise borrowing is repaid by water users rather than the tax rate.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Following summer recess, the Town Council resumed formal business under President Arthur Mathews with 10 members present and Councilor Christopher Heffernan excused. Before entering legislative discussions, Vice President Fred Happel led the chamber in a moment of silence to honor Robert “Bob” O’Connor, a Vietnam War veteran and long-time municipal pillar who passed away on August 5, 2026, after nearly 58 years of service as Weymouth’s DPW Director, acting director, and Energy Coordinator.

The primary policy measure of the night centered on local conservation enforcement. Presenting on behalf of Mayor Michael Molisse’s administration, Chief of Staff TJ Lacey introduced Measure 26 106, which seeks to overhaul Section 8-301(g) of the town ordinances. Under the proposed framework, enforcement of mandatory water restrictions would shift from existing baseline penalties to a formalized tiered escalation structure: a warning for a first offense, a $200 fine for a second offense, and a $300 fine for third and subsequent infractions. Each subsequent instance of non-compliance after an official citation would count as a distinct violation. The measure was referred to the Ordinance Committee without dissent.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Halifax property owners will continue to share an equalized property tax rate across all classes this coming fiscal year. At an annual public classification hearing on Tuesday evening, Principal Assessor Caroline Vogt and members of the Board of Assessors presented the town’s valuation trends and tax rate calculations, advising the board to maintain a single residential factor of 1.0.

Residential property constitutes 91.32% of Halifax’s total property valuation, while commercial, industrial, and personal property combined account for only 8.67%. Townwide real estate and personal property valuation rose by 7.2% year-over-year, reaching roughly $1.6 billion. For FY27, the estimated base tax rate is projected at $13.46 per $1,000 of assessed value. The average single-family home assessment grew 6.87% to approximately $658,000, resulting in an estimated annual tax bill of $7,655 (an increase of about 2% or $150 to $160). Condominium assessments saw an average increase of 5.82% to $341,000, generating an average annual tax bill of $4,600 (a 1% increase).

Assessing officials illustrated that adopting the maximum allowable 150% shift would have lowered the residential rate by just 64 cents—from $13.46 to $12.82 per thousand—saving the typical homeowner roughly $363 a year. However, that shift would have driven the commercial, industrial, and personal property rate up sharply to $20.19 per thousand, imposing thousands of dollars in added annual costs on local business owners.

The board concurred that shifting taxes onto Halifax’s modest retail corridor would hinder local commerce without providing substantial taxpayer relief. Beyond voting for a uniform factor of 1.0, the Select Board voted against implementing an open space discount (noting the town has no qualifying parcels), a residential exemption, and a small commercial exemption.

“It does look like it’s a great change in between from going residential to commercial, but if you went by assessed value and figuring out the tax rate, it would only save residential properties a couple hundred dollars, but it would burden the commercial properties by more than a couple thousand for their tax bill.” — Caroline Vogt, Principal Assessor

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Following years of inter-municipal discussions, the Select Board continued to progress the first major update to the Whitman-Hanson Regional School Agreement since 1992. Whitman-Hanson Regional School Committee Chair Ryan Tressel appeared before the board to urge adoption of four core framework points negotiated by the Regional Agreement Committee (RAC) alongside Whitman Select Board member Shawn Kain and Hanson representatives.

The four compromise items include:

1. Two-Thirds Voting Thresholds: Requiring a two-thirds majority vote by the school committee on high-impact financial actions, including hiring the superintendent, closing schools, or leasing school property.

2. Transportation Budgeting: Fully incorporating mandated and non-mandated busing directly into the district’s operating assessment, preventing recurring annual budget standoffs where they were sent as separate articles to Town Meeting.

3. Shifted Apportionment Due Dates: Moving the spring town payment deadline from April 1 to April 15 to better accommodate municipal tax collection cash flow.

4. District-Wide Capital Assessments: Assessing high school and district-wide capital expenses directly to both Whitman and Hanson, rather than relying on disparate town meeting warrant articles that frequently fall out of sync.

“Because when those three organizations are not working together, kids are hurt. And I think that we have an agreement, I think, that deals with a lot of the underlying issues that have been troubling us for the last few years.” — Ryan Tressel

Board member Shawn Kain strongly endorsed advancing the compromise to municipal counsel, emphasizing that Whitman faces impending budget cliffs driven by Plymouth County Retirement obligations projected to exceed $5 million. Vice Chair Daniel Salvucci voiced support for predictable capital planning, citing past deferrals—such as the regional high school parking lot—that allowed costs to escalate.

Select Board member Dawn Byers voiced opposition, arguing the changes weaken Whitman’s footing. Byers maintained that abandoning the strict statutory assessment framework risks repeating past funding imbalances and objected to adjusting capital thresholds without clear justification. She also flagged new language concerning representation adjustments triggered by population shifts under the “one person, one vote” principle, calling for an exhaustive, line-by-line redline review before any agreement is ratified.

Despite Byers’ objections, the board voted 3-2 to approve the four framework points in principle to allow the document to proceed to legal counsel.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Following decades of false starts, bankruptcies, and regulatory stalls under previous operators, New England Development Vice President John Twohig and Paul Cincotta appeared before the Abington Select Board during a public hearing on Tuesday evening to deliver a sweeping update on the 1,440-acre redevelopment site.

The developers closed on the property purchase on June 30, 2026, and officially awarded the project’s first roadway and infrastructure contract last week, with shovels hitting the ground within two weeks. The initial 1.5-mile roadway will branch off Shea Drive at Route 18, reconfigure the turn behind the jet plane memorial, bypass the sports complex and the former Navy gym, and connect straight down through the parkway roundabout to the Weymouth–Abington line. Utilities—including water, sewer force mains, drainage, and a new pump station—will accompany the corridor to unlock 10 initial development parcels.

Yet, the developers candidly laid out the stark geographic divide governing the massive site: all current development is restricted to the Weymouth side. Weymouth has allocated 450,000 gallons per day of municipal water to the project, but municipal law strictly prohibits those supplies from crossing town borders into Abington or Rockland.

“We have over 2,500 homes pre-sold, and that’s a combination of multifamily, single-family, townhomes, and over-55 developments... All in Weymouth, because that’s the only place we have water.” — John Twohig, Vice President, New England Development

To permanently resolve the regional water crisis, Weymouth and the Southfield Redevelopment Authority (SRA) have applied to join the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA). Backed by a $35 million state funding commitment and legislative support from Massachusetts House Speaker Ronald Mariano, the plan involves constructing an estimated $100-plus million, 36-inch water transmission line extending seven miles from Quincy and the Blue Hills down into Weymouth’s Great Pond treatment facility. The line will deliver roughly 14 million gallons per day—5.5 million designated for Weymouth and base development, leaving excess capacity for neighboring South Shore communities.

However, that pipeline will not be operational until 2031 or 2032. Because developers want to avoid waiting six to eight years to initiate Abington’s portion—which is planned for commercial office space, institutional facilities, and senior/over-55 townhome housing—they have opened negotiations with the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works. The developer has signed a preliminary memorandum of understanding reserving 350,000 gallons per day from the City of Brockton and is exploring capital improvements to existing local wells to unlock earlier construction in Abington.

Addressing fiscal concerns from Select Board members, Twohig noted that an updated fiscal impact study projects Abington will net roughly $4 million to $4.5 million annually in new growth revenue after factoring in town services like police, fire, DPW, and schooling. By statute, Chapter 40B affordable housing developments are excluded from the base, and developers emphasized that target demographics for over-55 and townhome communities historically generate very low student enrollment.

Hazardous Waste Regional Depot Delayed for Contract Review

Earlier in the meeting, Claire Galkowski, Executive Director of the South Shore Recycling Cooperative (SSRC), presented a proposed Intermunicipal Agreement (IMA) to establish a permanent, year-round Household Hazardous Waste Depot at the Hanover Transfer Station. The project, backed by a $250,000 state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) grant, seeks to replace the current system of 12 seasonal pop-up events across the South Shore.

Galkowski reported that the region faces severe cost and operational vulnerabilities due to an extreme shortage of licensed hazardous waste contractors, with only two operating across the Commonwealth. Under the agreement, 12 South Shore communities must sign the IMA before construction contracts can be awarded in late October. Operating costs would add roughly $2,400 annually per town, which could be offset by small resident co-payments ($10 to $30 based on volume).

While Select Board members expressed conceptual support, they voiced reluctance to serve as the first community to sign without legal vetting. On a motion by Daniel Eddy Jr., the board voted unanimously to continue the matter to September 28 to permit review of the multi-page legal contract.

Public Safety Honors and Flock Camera Fallout

The meeting opened with formal honors for Police Sergeant Stephen Marquardt upon his retirement following nearly 34 years of continuous service to the Abington Police Department. Select Board Chair Paul Bunker read an official town citation, and State Representative Alyson Sullivan-Almeida presented a resolution entered into the record by the Massachusetts House of Representatives commending Marquardt’s career, which included a lifesaving rescue of a woman from the path of an oncoming train.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The Select Board moved through a dense agenda focused heavily on town governance, municipal personnel stability, and finalizing warrant articles ahead of the October 5 Special Town Meeting.

The most urgent discussions centered on Article 13 of the draft warrant, an appropriation of $12,000 in free cash to install closed-circuit television (CCTV) security systems at Camp Kiwanee. Justine Ladroga, Chair of the Camp Kiwanee Commission, appeared before the board to detail an escalating pattern of trespassing, vandalism, and unauthorized access across the campgrounds. Officials reported that individuals have been breaking padlocks, entering rental cabins, damaging trails with electric bikes, and ignoring safety closures at the Cranberry Cove waterfront.

“It is important for the town to fund because while it is a gem, it is a huge liability for the town. And there are children unattended in these cabins. And the last thing we need to happen is a tragedy.” — Justine Ladroga, Chair of the Camp Kiwanee Commission

Town Administrator Lisa Green and Select Board members noted that the proposed camera network will tie directly into the Hanson Police Department’s monitoring systems—an upgrade Camp Kiwanee’s enterprise fund cannot independently support. The Board unanimously voted to place and recommend Article 13 for Town Meeting consideration.

Earlier in the evening, the Board sat as the Wage and Personnel Board to review updates to Article 2-12 of the Town Bylaws. To retain personnel and maintain regional competitiveness, the board raised the wage caps for alternate plumbing, gas, and wiring inspectors up to $75 per inspection call and increased the alternate building commissioner ceiling to $100. The adjustments also set full-time hourly pay ranges for the Executive Assistant and Police Chief Assistant at $30 to $44 per hour and established an Assistant Director of Elder Affairs position to facilitate succession planning at the Senior Center.

Following the wage adjustments, the Board conducted a comprehensive interview with candidate Dan Walsh for the role of Building Commissioner and Zoning Enforcement Officer. Walsh, bringing nearly 35 years of municipal and state regulatory experience—including tenures in Needham, Lincoln, and the state Office of Public Safety and Inspections—addressed board questions regarding long-term commitment and zoning challenges under expanding state mandates. Despite initial scrutiny over his commute from Needham and concerns regarding recent turnover in the department, member Frank Milisi cited Walsh’s stable 30-year employment history across only three agencies. The Board unanimously confirmed Walsh’s appointment effective September 21, 2026.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Gathering in the Middle-High School Learning Commons on August 26 and September 2, the Cohasset School Committee moved quickly across infrastructure, fiscal administration, student services, and operational policy to align district programs before the return of students.

Superintendent Dr. Sarah Shannon reported on August 26 that the major roof replacement project at the Joseph Osgood Elementary School is nearing full completion substantially under original cost projections. The project, estimated at $2,687,147, did not require significant contingency reserves. With the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) reimbursing 32.46% (up to $872,515), town officials plan to vote at the October 26 Special Town Meeting to direct reimbursed funds back into the Special Purpose School Capital Stabilization Fund.

Replenishing that stabilization reserve ensures Cohasset can present a warrant article allocating up to $2 million—on a not-to-exceed basis—to fund the MSBA Core Program Feasibility Study for the secondary campus (Cohasset Middle-High School) without requesting outside borrowing or fresh tax levies. The district expects the study itself will land between $1.5 million and $2 million, benefiting from the repurposing of data collected during a previous municipal study. Committee member Craig MacLellan cautioned the public that the study vote is purely exploratory:

“A vote to allocate the money from the special purpose school stabilization fund to the feasibility study for the MSBA is not a vote for a new school. ... It means that we will get to conduct the very regimented, structured feasibility study required by the MSBA to further explore the feasibility of that school.” — Craig MacLellan

The district also capitalized on an unexpected windfall in fleet operations. School officials announced they had successfully exited an electric bus lease, retained clear title to the vehicle at zero net acquisition cost, and finalized a direct trade approved by the Capital Planning Board for a brand-new 2027 Bluebird diesel bus backed by a five-year warranty. The transaction expands Cohasset’s bus fleet to 12 vehicles, preventing disrupted double-routes when vehicles require maintenance and curbing athletic charter expenses.

To steer financial reporting following administrative transitions, the Committee voted unanimously on August 26 to appoint Patricia “Trish” Boyer as Interim Director of Finance and Operations. Boyer, a veteran school business administrator with past leadership roles in Holbrook and Brockton, will work three days per week. By September 2, Boyer reported she was already 60% to 70% finished with the district’s mandatory state End-of-Year Financial Report (EOYR) due September 30 to DESE, protecting Cohasset’s Chapter 70 state aid against penalties while preparing modernized, readable monthly reporting packages for committee oversight.

Operational restructuring also centered on the Cohasset Public Schools (CPS) Before and After School Program, transitioned from the town Recreation Department into an in-house district pilot led by Director Brett Youmans. Because state licensing standards strictly mandate a 1:13 adult-to-child ratio, the program could no longer support open, unregistered daily drop-in care. To address family scheduling pressures, administrators created five periodic care slots per session (AM and PM daily), booked on a weekly first-come, first-served basis via online forms filed the prior Thursday. Across both meetings, the School Committee debated and formally adopted the comprehensive Before and After School Family Handbook, establishing attendance policies, aligning behavioral standards with school building rules, and setting rates ($20 morning, $30 afternoon, and $40 half-day care).

Read more

The dominant story this week isn’t really contained to one topic. Beacon Hill quietly rewrote the rules of local zoning and handed developers the upper hand, even as a ballot question aims to force the Legislature itself to live under the same disclosure rules it imposes on every town hall. That irony — state government tightening its grip on municipal land use while resisting scrutiny of its own paperwork — sits alongside a second, homegrown pattern: town after town discovering its own administrative plumbing is broken. Marshfield doesn’t control its own public records portal. Plymouth can’t document a third of the properties its Community Preservation money bought. Duxbury discovered a cable franchise renewal moving forward with no contract in hand for the board or the public to read. None of these are Prop 2½ stories, but all of them are trust-in-government stories, and they’re accumulating.

Subscribe now

State Preemption and the Zoning Wars

• Norwell — State Overhaul of Chapter 40A Upends Local Zoning and Lowers Variance Hurdles in Norwell A stealth budget-bill rewrite replaces the old four-part hardship test with a lenient “practical difficulty” standard and locks in 24 months of zoning protection the moment a builder files for a permit — Town Counsel Robert Galvin says appeals will now be “really difficult.”

• East Bridgewater — East Bridgewater Moves to Ban Commercial Data Centers Town-Wide The Planning Board voted unanimously to sponsor an outright, town-wide prohibition on commercial data centers ahead of a September 21 public hearing, joining a growing regional defensive crouch against AI-driven infrastructure.

Accountability and Administrative Breakdowns

• Marshfield — Marshfield Select Board Demands Immediate Handover of Public Records Portal Following Town Clerk Dispute A stipend cut triggered a standoff over who controls the FOIA Direct portal, leaving records requests — including ones tied to the town’s override vote — unrouted for weeks until the board seized control by ultimatum.

• Plymouth — 44 CPA Properties Face Missing Deed Restrictions as Plymouth Select Board Clashes Over Accountability A two-decade paperwork lapse means only 10 of 33 historic CPA restrictions have ever been recorded, jeopardizing future borrowing and pitting the board against nonprofits like Pilgrim Hall over frozen grant payments.

• Duxbury — Duxbury Pushes Pause on Verizon Cable Contract to Demand Resident Data and In-Person Accountability The Selectboard refused to act on a five-year renewal after discovering neither members nor the public had ever seen the actual contract text, and is now demanding a Verizon representative show up in person.

Back to School: Staffing Up, Mandates Down

• Pembroke — Pembroke Opens School Year Adding Staff, Rolling Out Stricter Phone Rules and Civil Enforcement Safeguards Twenty-two new hires at the high school alone, plus numbered wall caddies for phones — a rare district bucking the regional contraction trend.

• Abington — State Curriculum Mandates and Fall Launch Dominate Abington School Committee Agenda DESE’s fall-2027 deadline for state-vetted ELA materials drew a blunt reaction from committee member Heidi Hernandez: “yet another unfunded mandate.”

• Halifax — Restored Municipal Funding Paves Way for Key Classroom Hires Ahead of School Year in Halifax A $200,000 town allocation restored three general-ed teaching positions just in time to handle an 82-student second grade and a 92-student third grade.

• Hingham — Hingham Prepares Multi-Year Budget Strategy and Eyes Extra High School Design Funds Ahead of Fall Session The district is scrapping single-year budgeting for a three-year forecasting model timed to a January 20 Select Board deadline, while MSBA filings advance for two elementary roof overhauls.

  Share

Infrastructure, Water, and Regional Agreements

• Rockland — Facing Water Deficits, Rockland Explores MWRA Pipeline and Developer Partnerships as Emergency Restrictions Persist With growth stalled under a Level 4 water emergency, officials are weighing MWRA entry against a stalled Union Point project that could otherwise mean $4–6 million a year in tax revenue.

• Hanson — Regional School Agreement Moves to Joint Legal Review as Hanson Select Board Prepares Fall Town Meeting Warrant A revised Whitman-Hanson pact adds an October 1 capital-notice deadline and two-thirds voting thresholds, while free cash has slid to roughly $2 million ahead of October Special Town Meeting.

• Scituate — Scituate Weighs $2.73M Police Range Return for Special Town Meeting, Approves Union Contract With Cruiser Cameras The firing range returns after falling just short of a two-thirds vote in April, now $200,000 more expensive, alongside a ratified police contract that trades a 1% raise for dashboard cameras.

Heritage and Preservation

• Hull — Hull Mounts Bid to Secure Historic Boston Light as Federal Decommissioning Looms The Select Board voted 5-0 to submit a letter of interest to the GSA after the Coast Guard’s decommissioning push and the Park Service’s decline left America’s oldest lighthouse open to local stewardship.

The Statehouse and the Ballot

• Series — The November Nine: Question 1 The Legislature and governor’s office would finally be subject to the same ten-day, nickel-a-page public records law every town already follows. The first in a South Shore News ballot question series.

Last Week, In Case You Missed It

• Recap — South Shore News...letter: The Override That Wasn’t Marshfield’s override failure, Rockland’s insurance-carrier fix, and Whitman-Hanson’s 65 eliminated positions set the stage for this week’s accountability reckonings.

Looking Ahead

• September 14 — Duxbury Selectboard reconvenes its Verizon cable hearing at 6:45 p.m., with a company representative expected in person.

• September 14 — Marshfield’s Ted Langill presents a permanent public records operations plan to the Select Board.

• September 21, 7:15 p.m. — East Bridgewater Planning Board holds its public hearing on the town-wide data center ban.

• October 2 — Deadline for Hull and the Hull Lifesaving Museum to submit GSA letters of interest for Boston Light.

• October 19 — Scituate Special Town Meeting votes on the $2.73 million police firing range and other capital articles.

• November 3 —State Election, including the ballot questions explored in the November Nine.

  South Shore News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is the second in a nine part series looking at each of the ballot questions coming to Massachusetts voters in November.

Please take the poll in the middle of the article.

Question 2 is likely the least understood measure on this year’s ballot, and there is a specific reason why.

In the UMass Amherst/WCVB poll taken Aug. 5–12, 13 percent of registered voters said they did not understand Question 2 — the highest share of any of the nine questions. Another 18 percent were undecided. It draws 45 percent support and 24 percent opposition, making it one of only two questions on the ballot without majority backing.

The confusion is not the voters’ fault. Massachusetts provides lawyers to defendants who cannot afford them through two entirely separate channels, and almost everything the public knows about the subject comes from a crisis involving the channel Question 2 does not touch.

Subscribe now

The two channels

The first is the Committee for Public Counsel Services, a state agency created in 1983 that employs salaried public defenders along with investigators, social workers and support staff. Chief Counsel Anthony Benedetti told a legislative committee in March that the agency has 864 employees, 425 of them attorneys. Its staff attorneys handled 31,128 cases in the last fiscal year.

The second is the private bar: roughly 2,600 attorneys in active practice — the agency says about 3,000 are trained and certified — who take court appointments at an hourly rate. They are independent contractors, not state employees. They handled 185,288 cases last year, about 86 percent of the total by CPCS’s own count, though the agency and most coverage round it to 80 percent.

Question 2 covers the first group only. It is the second group that stopped taking cases in 2025.

What it would actually do

The measure amends Chapter 150E, the state’s public employee collective bargaining law, to add CPCS to the definition of an employer — and requires the agency, once it has signed a contract, to ask the Governor for the money to fund it. That is essentially the whole thing.

A collective bargaining agreement is a negotiated contract between an employer and its employees’ chosen representative, covering pay, benefits and working conditions and enforceable through a grievance process. CPCS employees do not have one and cannot obtain one, because Chapter 150E does not list their agency, which means the state’s labor relations board has no jurisdiction to certify a union for them. Organizers describe the gap as a drafting oversight; the agency was created a decade after the bargaining law, so it was never written in.

What a union could and could not do

Question 2 would treat CPCS the way the law already treats the state lottery commission and the county sheriffs: the agency can bargain, but anything that costs money goes to the Governor, who has forty-five days to decide whether to ask the Legislature for it. If she does not, the statute sends the request “back to the parties for further bargaining” — which means the deal is dead and negotiation starts over.

So a union could not force a raise. The Governor can stop it before the Legislature ever sees it, and the Legislature still holds the purse. Anyone telling voters this is how public defenders finally get paid is overstating it.

There is a further obstacle the campaign does not discuss. CPCS attorney salaries are set in statute. Even a signed contract and a funded appropriation would not change them on their own — the Legislature would have to pass a separate bill amending the salary provisions.

It also could not lawfully strike. Massachusetts bars public employees from striking, and Question 2 would bring CPCS staff under that ban.

What a union would get is authority over terms that carry no cost — grievance procedures, just-cause protection against discipline, seniority, how cases are assigned. Within the subjects the law makes bargainable, a contract also overrides conflicting provisions in nineteen chapters of state law, including the statutes governing state personnel, civil service and court administration.

The prize proponents talk about most is caseload and workload standards. Two cautions there. Bargaining is a duty to negotiate in good faith, not a right to obtain — and whether caseload limits are a mandatory subject of bargaining or a management prerogative is exactly the kind of question that takes years to litigate before the labor relations board, particularly for an agency operating under a constitutional mandate. Today those standards are set by CPCS itself, by a statutory requirement that staff attorneys handle 20 percent of new cases, and ultimately by the courts.

What CPCS attorneys are paid

This is the number missing from most coverage, and it complicates the case.

CPCS staff attorneys start at $79,500. Assistant district attorneys start at $72,000. Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden told the Legislature’s budget committees that prosecutors “run a risk of losing district attorneys to the Committee for Public Counsel Services,” and that assistant district attorneys “certainly should not be making less than public defenders.”

CPCS’s own most recent report to the Legislature shows 8 attorney vacancies against 408.6 attorney full-time equivalents as of June 30, 2025.

The crisis that put this on the ballot

In late May 2025, court-appointed lawyers across Massachusetts began refusing new appointments, most visibly in Suffolk and Middlesex counties. They were paid $65 an hour for district court work — against $150 in Maine, $125 to $150 in New Hampshire and $112 to $142 in Rhode Island.

On July 3, 2025, the SJC triggered what is known as the Lavallee protocol in the Middlesex and Suffolk district courts and the Boston Municipal Court: a defendant held seven days without a lawyer must be released, and a case pending forty-five days without one must be dismissed. About 120 cases were thrown out in a single day in Boston Municipal Court that July. By Aug. 27, 2025, more than 4,200 defendants statewide had no lawyer. As of February 2026, courts counted at least 1,687 cases dismissed and 198 people released, figures they called conservative.

The Legislature responded with a law Gov. Maura Healey signed on Aug. 5, 2025, raising bar advocate pay to $75 an hour, providing a further increase to $85 effective Aug. 1, 2026, and appropriating $40 million to hire about 320 new staff public defenders by the end of fiscal 2027. As of February, 57 had been hired with 45 more signed. The crisis eased — about 25 defendants were charged without lawyers in late February, one in custody — though the stoppage was never formally called off.

Two things followed from that law, and together they explain why Question 2 exists.

First, it provides that a coordinated agreement among bar advocates to refuse appointments shall be evidence of a violation of the state’s antitrust act. It does not outlaw a stoppage outright, but it hands the state a ready-made theory against one. The Massachusetts Association of Private Appointed Counsel and several individual attorneys sued Attorney General Andrea Campbell over the provision in May 2026, arguing it targets protected expression. No ruling had issued as of the end of August.

Second, the $40 million is about to nearly double the size of the workforce Question 2 would organize. The petition was filed days after the Governor signed that law, and SEIU Local 888 announced its organizing drive on Aug. 11, 2025 — at the peak of the collapse.

So the intuitive story is right about why this is on the ballot. It is wrong about what the measure would do. The contractors who forced the Legislature’s hand got a raise and a new legal shadow; the staff attorneys got neither a raise nor bargaining rights, and their bill went nowhere.

Share

What happened in this area

Less than most readers would assume, and the geography is worth getting right.

The refusals were statewide, but the Lavallee protocol was never extended beyond Suffolk, Middlesex and the Boston Municipal Court. No court in Brockton, Plymouth, Hingham or Wareham ever operated under it. That distinction matters: the protocol was the mechanism that forced releases and dismissals, so a defendant without a lawyer in Plymouth District Court had no such clock running in his favor.

A Massachusetts Trial Court informal assessment of late May 2025 recorded twelve defendants released in Quincy District Court for lack of representation, and three unrepresented in the Plymouth and Falmouth district courts.

CPCS petitioned in July 2025 to extend the protocol to juvenile cases, reporting sixty-five juveniles without lawyers across the counties it named, including Norfolk. Justice Dalila Argaez Wendlandt denied the request, writing that the problem was “better addressed on an individualized, case-by-case basis.”

On June 25, 2025, Plymouth District Attorney Timothy Cruz moved to intervene in the Lavallee case. The court denied the motion without prejudice, noting the petition sought the protocol only in Middlesex and Suffolk. The order does not say what Cruz wanted.

The case against

Ten weeks before the ballots are printed, the state’s own watchdog made it.

On June 10, 2026, Inspector General Jeffrey Shapiro issued a report describing Massachusetts public defense as “broken, expensive, and resistant to oversight.” It found that CPCS staff attorneys carry lower caseloads than public defenders in Connecticut, New Hampshire and Vermont — and lower than Massachusetts assistant district attorneys. It found the agency has too many supervisors relative to its caseload, spends $2,752 per new case against $1,200 to $2,500 in neighboring states, and has handled under 16 percent of new indigent cases against a statutory mandate of 20 percent, missing that mark for at least a decade. It also found that during the 2025 stoppage, CPCS staff were largely unavailable at peak hours and that the agency “contributed to the detrimental effects” of the crisis.

Every one of those findings cuts against the case for Question 2. If staff caseloads are already low by regional standards, bargained caseload caps solve a problem the IG says does not exist in the form proponents describe. If the agency is already resistant to oversight, a contract that overrides conflicting statute is a strange remedy. And the account of staff attorneys as bystanders to a crisis caused by contractors is contradicted by an official finding that they made it worse.

Benedetti’s answer is on the record: “Public defense is not a mechanical system. Caseload numbers alone do not measure whether representation is constitutionally effective.” That is a serious rebuttal, and reasonable people weigh the two differently.

Beyond the IG, the objections are these. Prosecutors have a live grievance about pay parity, described above. Bar advocates — who handle most of the caseload and are excluded from Question 2 — were told the $40 million would shift work away from them toward staff attorneys; MAPAC president Sean Delaney has said the underlying crisis “hasn’t gone away.” A contract raises personnel costs against a budget with no dedicated revenue, and no fiscal estimate exists. And work rules constraining how CPCS assigns attorneys could reduce the flexibility the agency used to move lawyers into overwhelmed courtrooms in 2025.

On cost, the state has now weighed in — barely. The Executive Office for Administration and Finance, in the Information for Voters guide mailed to households this month, wrote that Question 2 "may have an impact on state finances," that CPCS is funded in part by state appropriations, and that "the fiscal impact of the proposed law is difficult to project due to the uncertainty regarding the outcomes of any such collective bargaining." It is the only one of the nine questions where the state declined to call the fiscal consequences immaterial — and it is not an estimate. Nobody has produced a number.

At the March 16 hearing before the Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions, no one testified in opposition. Rep. Michael Day of Stoneham, a committee member who co-chaired that hearing, raised the one concern on the record: “What the ethical obligation is for an attorney versus what their role is as a member of the union, is certainly one with public defenders that’s very acute, given their job is representing these individuals.”

No committee appears to have registered against Question 2. A yes campaign exists, backed by SEIU Local 888, the Massachusetts Defenders Union, AFT Massachusetts and the National Association of Government Employees.

And there is now a definitive measure of how little organized opposition exists. Massachusetts law requires the Information for Voters guide to print an argument against every ballot question. For Question 2, nobody submitted one. Under a statute directing the Secretary of the Commonwealth to write the argument himself when no opponent comes forward, Galvin’s office prepared it, drawing on the Legislature’s majority report. The guide prints a notice saying so, and where an author’s name would normally appear it prints the statute instead.

That state-written argument is the closest thing to a formal case against Question 2 that anyone has made: that CPCS is an independent judicial-branch agency, and that collective bargaining could disrupt its supervisory structure, blur lines of authority, and limit its flexibility to respond to caseloads that swing.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Norwell town leaders received a comprehensive briefing Wednesday on landmark changes to the state’s Zoning Act, Chapter 40A, which legislative leaders enacted without traditional stand-alone public committee hearings by inserting them directly into the state budget (see South Shore News coverage here). Town Counsel Robert Galvin and Planning Board member and veteran South Shore developer Steve Bjorklund outlined how the legislative maneuvers fundamentally reshape local land use, variance thresholds, and municipal enforcement.

At the center of the legislative revision is a significant weakening of the historic legal threshold required to obtain a zoning variance. Under Massachusetts case law dating back decades, property owners and developers had to satisfy a stringent four-part “substantial hardship” test based strictly on soil conditions, lot shape, or topography unique to the parcel. Under the newly enacted statute, that nearly insurmountable hurdle has been replaced with a lenient “practical difficulty” standard. Furthermore, local Zoning Boards of Appeals (ZBA) are now mandated by law to consider whether granting relief supports public interests in housing production.

Galvin emphasized that the state provided no statutory definition for what constitutes “practical difficulty,” leaving local boards across the Commonwealth in a period of legal ambiguity until appellate courts interpret the standard. Galvin drafted an interim standard for the Norwell ZBA—vetted through the Attorney General’s Municipal Law Unit—defining it as a minor, non-self-created dimensional or use issue where strict compliance is unreasonably burdensome without reaching the severity of the old statute. In addition, Norwell’s long-standing prohibition against use variances has been partially overridden: the town can no longer prohibit a commercial property owner from obtaining a variance to convert a commercial structure into residential housing.

The statutory revisions also expand grandfathering protections under Chapter 40A, Section 6. Rather than requiring an approved permit in hand prior to the first public hearing notice of a proposed zoning bylaw change, builders now lock in existing zoning protections the moment they submit an application for a building permit or special permit. That freeze remains active throughout the entire permitting process and extends for 24 months after the final permit is secured. Nonconforming protections have also expanded: property owners can now allow a nonconforming use or structure to lapse for four years—up from two—before abandonment is legally established. Residential and commercial owners looking to alter or expand nonconforming structures can also bypass the ZBA entirely and secure a building permit directly from the building commissioner, provided the expansion respects current setback and height requirements.

Bjorklund noted that while the state relaxed variance rules and previously abolished the common-ownership lot merger doctrine under the Affordable Housing Act for lots of at least 10,000 square feet with 75 feet of frontage, those provisions explicitly cap residential construction at 1,850 square feet of heated living space with a minimum of three bedrooms. Bjorklund urged local boards to maintain discipline when balancing variance petitions so older neighborhoods are not overwhelmed by outsized developments.

“Variance is going to be easier to obtain. Housing projects are gaining more priority... and decisions will be made that facilitate development, probably more housing. It’s still going to be really difficult for anybody to appeal.” — Robert Galvin, Town Counsel

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Convening for a brief special session, the Planning Board acted swiftly on growing regional concerns surrounding the expansion of high-density computing infrastructure. Town Counsel drafted the proposed bylaw text following an earlier board consensus in favor of either an outright prohibition or severe restrictions on such facilities.

The proposed bylaw defines data centers as facilities or buildings primarily engaged in digital data storage, processing, cloud hosting, cryptocurrency mining, or artificial intelligence operations. Crucially, the measure explicitly excludes standard accessory IT hardware—such as standard server rooms and computers used by schools, municipal offices, hospitals, and routine commercial operations—as well as standard public utility and telecommunications facilities, unless those facilities are leveraged for commercial data hosting or cryptocurrency mining. Under the draft language, commercial data facilities would be designated an expressly prohibited use across every zoning district in East Bridgewater.

Planning Board Chair Kevin Reilly explained that the vote served two specific administrative functions: establishing board sponsorship of the zoning article and scheduling the required statutory public hearing. Board Vice-Chair Myles Heger moved to sponsor the article and schedule the hearing for September 21, 2026, at 7:15 p.m., which passed with unanimous support from all five members present.

“Town Counsel, in the meanwhile, has facilitated the preparation of an article, a potential article, which would amount to a ban town-wide on data centers as they’re defined in that text.” — Kevin Reilly, Planning Board Chair

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

America’s oldest light station may soon enter local hands. At Wednesday’s meeting, representatives from the Hull Lifesaving Museum alongside State Representative Joan Meschino presented a plan for the town and the museum to submit separate, parallel letters of interest to the federal General Services Administration (GSA) before an October 2 deadline. The move positions Hull as a direct contender to acquire and operate the historic site on Little Brewster Island at no transfer cost.

Museum Executive Director Mike McGurl and Director of Development Maureen Gillis outlined the opportunity under federal law, which allows government entities and qualified non-profits to acquire decommissioned maritime landmarks for public preservation. While the National Park Service (NPS) had initially been positioned to take over stewardship, the agency recently formally declined the transfer due to severe budget constraints and staffing reductions, shifting the responsibility to local stakeholders.

“Boston Light is America’s oldest lighthouse. It’s a national treasure that has guided mariners and navigators... for more than three centuries. And it’s always been part of Hull’s maritime story.” [00:20:41] — Maureen Gillis, Hull Lifesaving Museum Director of Development

Rep. Meschino provided regional context, explaining that legislative leaders have tracked the Coast Guard’s nationwide divestment of historical assets since 2020. Meschino emphasized that submitting two standalone letters of interest protects both parties: it qualifies each applicant individually under federal vetting rules while preserving a shared collaborative framework. This ensures that if the municipality decides down the road that direct management carries excessive financial liabilities, the Lifesaving Museum can continue its application independently or with other regional partners.

Board members voiced support for safeguarding the landmark from private acquisition while questioning the operational and financial hurdles ahead. Vice Chair Jerry Taverna and Member Irwin Nesoff asked about long-term maintenance liabilities, specialized restoration expenses, and inter-agency coordination. Rep. Meschino noted that while the U.S. Coast Guard will permanently retain navigational aids—such as the light and foghorn—and NPS will retain historic preservation oversight, the physical buildings and island grounds would transition to the chosen steward. The board voted 5-0 to approve the letter of interest submission.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Gathering at North Pembroke Elementary School just hours after back-to-school open houses welcomed families across the district, the Pembroke School Committee received comprehensive opening-day briefings from administrators spanning elementary grades through high school.

At Pembroke High School, Principal Marc Talbot detailed a series of facility enhancements, including repainted gym walls in “Pembroke blue,” refurbished athletic flooring, and pending carpet installations. High school enrollment stands at 678 students, including 167 freshmen. Talbot underscored that unlike neighboring communities facing contractions, Pembroke added positions across departments:

• 22 new faces joined the high school staff, including 12 classroom teachers, 5 paraprofessionals, 4 office personnel, and 1 custodian, filling vacancies from retirements, departures, and newly unfrozen positions.

• The high school is implementing built-in common planning time for educators once every seven-day rotation cycle to fulfill accreditation priorities identified by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC).

• Advanced Placement (AP) participation expanded, with 36% of high school students taking at least one AP exam and nearly 80% attaining qualifying scores of 3 or higher.

Talbot also outlined two immediate operational changes aimed at student engagement: an electronic hall pass system to track building movement, and an updated cell phone rule requiring students to place devices into assigned, numbered classroom wall caddies upon entering class until the bell rings. Medical exceptions, such as continuous monitoring for students with Type 1 diabetes, are coordinated individually with school staff.

At the elementary and middle school levels, administrators outlined significant infrastructure upgrades and academic rollouts:

• Hobomock Elementary: Rooftop HVAC replacement completed over the summer now supplies functioning air conditioning across the building. The school fully staffed a specialized social-emotional learning program serving four students in grades 2 and 3, supported by a full-time special education teacher, a registered behavior technician (RBT), a shared board certified behavior analyst (BCBA), and a newly hired district-wide RBT.

• Bryantville and North Pembroke Elementary: North Pembroke housed summer programs including Camp Invention and the YMCA, while Bryantville completed gym ceiling and floor restorations following past roof replacements. Both schools received upgraded kitchen steamers.

• Curriculum Updates: The FOSS science program is expanding district-wide across grades 1 through 6, while grade 6 social studies classes are rolling out the “Investigating History” inquiry-based curriculum. About 40 elementary teachers will continue piloting the Simplified Writing curriculum.

• Pembroke Community Middle School (PCMS): Principal Donna McGarrigle announced the launch of an embedded orchestra program scheduled during the school day for 7th and 8th graders, as well as a student recognition initiative titled “Don’t Meet the Standard, Raise the Standard”.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Opening the meeting on the eve of the first day of school, the Abington School Committee addressed a series of academic, logistical, and state-level regulatory developments. Assistant Superintendent Dr. Christopher Basta provided an in-depth update on the district’s K–5 English Language Arts (ELA) curriculum selection process under the state PRISM-2 grant. After having to pause an initial curriculum pilot late last school year when a reviewed program failed to clear state thresholds, the district secured authorization to carry forward approximately $136,000 in unused grant funds into the current fiscal year, alongside an additional continuation grant award exceeding $200,000 to fund pilot training and materials.

The selection process is governed by stringent state mandates. The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) is requiring school districts statewide to implement DESE-approved “High-Quality Instructional Materials” (HQIM) by fall 2027, drawing primarily from the state’s CURATE review registry.

“Of course, all students deserve high quality instructional material regardless. But this seems to be yet another unfunded mandate.” [20:15] — Heidi Hernandez, School Committee Member

Basta noted that Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) remains on the state’s vetted list as an all-in-one K–5 program incorporating foundational reading skills, with district teams planning to evaluate it alongside another prospective curriculum this fall. Committee member Heidi Hernandez expressed concern over the state mandate, questioning both its timeline and fiscal burden on local school departments. District leadership also reported submitting an application for DESE’s Strengthening ESL Programming and Services Grant to replace an elementary English learner curriculum currently being sunsetted by its publisher.

In special services, Director of Student Services Dr. James Robbins reported that the district’s summer Extended School Year (ESY) program served 108 students with disabilities across preschool through Grade 12 to prevent summer regression. An additional 21 middle school students took part in academic continuity recovery, and six high school English learners completed an intensive, Title III-funded summer English course to stay on track for graduation.

Robbins also announced a new partnership between the school department, local organization Abington COPES, and virtual healthcare provider Cartwheel. The agreement funds 15 student clinical referrals, connecting children in Grades 2 through 12 to telehealth therapy, psychiatric care, and social support services both during the school day and at home.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

The Scituate Select Board faced a packed agenda on Tuesday night, balancing high-dollar long-term municipal investments with downtown community events.

Leading the policy agenda was a presentation by Capital Planning Committee Chair Michael Gibson on recommendations for the October 19, 2026 Special Town Meeting warrant. The headlining item is the proposed indoor police firing range, returning before voters after falling just short of the required two-thirds borrowing threshold at the April Annual Town Meeting with roughly 61–62% approval. Gibson explained that the project estimate has climbed roughly $200,000 to $2.73 million due to escalating costs.

Town officials outlined two funding pathways: either borrowing the entire $2.73 million sum or utilizing a split package consisting of $1.2 million in borrowing and $1.53 million from free cash. Gibson emphasized that debt service could be accommodated within the town’s existing $2 million borrowing envelope without increasing taxes as older municipal debt retires. Town Administrator Jim Boudreau stressed that modern tactical training is impossible under current arrangements at outside facilities.

“Took my pistol and I did very well. And then the range officer gave me a ballistic shield, turned off the lights, put on strobes, and said, ‘Now reach around and walk through the door and see how very well [you do].’ Scenario-based... those are the types of things that we can’t really do right now.” — Jim Boudreau, Town Administrator

Board members agreed that the project requires clearer public outreach ahead of Town Meeting to ease community concerns regarding multi-town usage and operational control. The Capital Planning Committee also unanimously recommended $57,600 to replace a totaled DPW truck, saving over $10,000 by salvaging existing plow equipment. Formal board votes on Town Meeting warrant recommendations were deferred until all five members could participate.

In labor negotiations, Human Resources Director Bob Clark presented a finalized three-year Memorandum of Agreement with MASSCOP Local 461 covering FY27 through FY29. The contract provides across-the-board cost-of-living adjustments of 2.5% in each of the three years. Additionally, it restructures overtime into base wages for “5 and 2” administrative personnel and expands specialist stipends ($250 to $2,500 annually) for evidence, K-9, and domestic violence officers.

Significantly, the contract includes an additional 1.0% wage increase in Year 2 tied directly to the union’s agreement to implement outward-facing in-car dashboard cameras. Town Administrator Boudreau noted the technology protects both the public and officers during motor vehicle stops and OUI investigations. The board unanimously ratified the agreement and congratulated Clark on his upcoming retirement set for December 16.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

A comprehensive inventory of Community Preservation Act (CPA) projects delivered by Town Counsel Attorney Kate McKay and Community Preservation Committee (CPC) Coordinator Kristin Ford outlined a systemic administrative breakdown dating back more than two decades.

According to Massachusetts General Law Chapter 44B, Section 12, real property interests acquired or rehabilitated using Community Preservation funds must be bound by a permanent restriction running with the land. However, the town’s review cataloged 44 missing restrictions across multiple sectors:

• Recreation: 25 unrecorded restrictions, including the Rail Trail ($400,000), Hedges Pond ($4.125 million across two votes), Stephens Field ($3.56 million across four authorizations), Nelson Park Playground ($476,529), and Jenney Pond dredging ($2.2 million).

• Historic Preservation: 18 total missing restrictions, with five currently in progress. Outstanding properties include the 1820 Courthouse ($6.575 million across two articles), the Spire Center ($3.6 million), and Burial Hill ($750,000). The five active drafts include four distinct votes for the First Parish Meetinghouse totaling over $2.97 million and Pilgrim Hall Museum’s 2023 grant of $3.2 million.

• Open Space: Six restrictions remain unrecorded but are progressing through legal review, including the Simes House ($200,000), Camp Norse off Carver Road ($900,000), Siever ($117,000), and Full Sail ($875,000). Restrictions for Rocky Point ($175,000) and the Pinnacle project ($1.21 million) were scheduled for recording immediately following the meeting.

• Affordable Housing: One property, Oak Street ($1.238 million across two Town Meeting votes), remains unrecorded. The lapse has disqualified the site’s three housing units from being counted on the Commonwealth’s Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI) due to procedural omissions, including the absence of a proper lottery when the units were initially occupied.

The presentation sparked a contentious debate over newly implemented CPC safeguards, which dictate that no grant disbursements will be released going forward without prior proof of a recorded deed restriction.

Representatives of prominent local nonprofits strongly pushed back. Donna Curtin, executive director of the Pilgrim Society and Pilgrim Hall Museum, warned the Select Board that the inventory was misleading and created redundant hurdles. Curtin argued that institutions like Pilgrim Hall already placed historic preservation restrictions on their properties decades ago and that requiring newly drafted state-level restrictions for emergency capital repairs—such as leaking roofs—creates burdensome, multi-year delays.

Select Board member Kevin Canty firmly rejected that reasoning, emphasizing that town staff and legal counsel are strictly bound by the language voted by Town Meeting. Canty pointed out that material modifications to a building, such as enclosing a leaking skylight at Pilgrim Hall, alter the architectural fabric and legally necessitate updated covenants.

“Without the restrictions, the money that was appropriated could be lost because there’s no protections. And that’s some of the issues we’ve been dealing with some of the organizations as of late, that we don’t have restrictions in place to protect the dollars that were appropriated and to protect the work that was completed with those dollars.” — Derek Brindisi, Town Manager

Town Manager Derek Brindisi noted that only 10 of 33 historic restrictions (less than 33%) have ever been recorded in the history of Plymouth’s CPC. Finance Director Lynne Barrett added that municipal bond counsel legally requires recorded property interests before Plymouth can execute municipal borrowing authorized by Town Meeting, elevating the issue from administrative bookkeeping to fiscal compliance.

Select Board member Bill Keohan called for patience and administrative collaboration, pointing out that state-level reviews at the Massachusetts Historical Commission and the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs often take years due to single-person review desks. Keohan advocated for releasing a withheld $300,000 final payment to Pilgrim Hall as documents finalize, but Canty and Chair Deborah Iaquinto held firm that taxpayer protections cannot be negotiated away after the fact.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

Rockland and Abington remain under an emergency water conservation order while grappling with aging water mains, strict safe yield limits under the Water Management Act, and regional housing pressures. At Tuesday’s meeting, leadership from the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works (ARJWW) and regional engineering consultants laid out both immediate realities and decades-long infrastructure options.

ARJWW representatives highlighted recent milestones, notably bringing a PFAS water treatment plant online in March 2026 that removes contaminants beyond required thresholds, while managing the excavation expansion at Hannigan Reservoir and progress on Well No. 4 at Myers Avenue. However, ARJWW commissioners noted that groundwater and surface supplies are tightly restricted by state permits. Currently, the system relies on an emergency interconnection to purchase Brockton water through Whitman, an arrangement officials characterized as vital yet costly.

Board members focused sharply on how supply shortages continue to bottleneck commercial development and municipal tax growth. Board member Lori Childs noted that the stalled Union Point project could yield an estimated $4 million to $6 million annually in town tax revenues, emphasizing that developer-backed feasibility studies at Myers Avenue and the decommissioned Fox’s Pit well site should move forward promptly. In response, ARJWW officials noted they are actively conducting legal reviews of a revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) received in August from New England Development (NED). They stressed that testing requests—including allocations of up to 25,000 gallons of water—require strict state regulatory review and careful scrutiny to ensure future operational and capital costs do not fall onto local ratepayers.

“We are limited by what our Water Management Act permit allows us to withdraw out of the reservoirs, but that’s due to safe yields of what the source has available... We really need the community to kind of get together and follow those regulations and the restrictions.” — Kristel Cameron (ARJWW Superintendent) [23:44]

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

At its Tuesday evening session, the Hanson Select Board tackled a packed agenda highlighted by significant progress on the long-negotiated Whitman-Hanson Regional School Agreement. Select Board member Frank Milisi presented the draft updates alongside Whitman-Hanson Regional School Committee Chair Ryan Tressel and Vice Chair T.J. Roffey.

The proposed agreement seeks to replace the operative 1992 document by modernizing financial timelines and protecting member towns. Under the proposal, shared district-wide capital expenses—such as textbook curricula and high school building improvements—will remain part of the operating assessment. However, to prevent budget surprises that could lead to town meetings rejecting the entire school assessment, the draft mandates that the school district provide member towns’ capital committees, finance committees, and select boards with proposed capital requests by October 1 of each year.

While Select Board Clerk Ed Heal questioned whether an October 1 deadline leaves Hanson enough time to incorporate figures into its October Special Town Meeting warrant, School Committee and board members clarified that the October notice establishes a mechanism for Hanson to set aside funds in its school stabilization account in the fall. Those earmarked funds can then be appropriated at the annual May Town Meeting, smoothing out the fiscal impact and syncing Hanson’s appropriations with Whitman’s spring calendar.

The revised regional agreement also codifies two-thirds full-committee vote requirements for major actions—such as school closures—rather than simple majorities of members present. Additionally, the draft mandates that all three governing bodies (the Hanson Select Board, Whitman Select Board, and the School Committee) review and vote to reaffirm the agreement every three years starting in September. If any board objects, the Regional Agreement Committee reconvenes while the existing agreement remains binding. The draft is now headed to legal counsel for all three entities for concurrent legal review.

“I like the fact that this right here does something that we’ve never been able to do before that I’ve ever experienced, which is have an open conversation about the needs in a timely manner. And then we can hone in on a process as we kind of figure it out.” [[02:00:21]] — Joseph Weeks, Select Board Member

Beyond regional education, the board conducted an extensive review of articles slated for the October Special Town Meeting warrant. Town Accountant Eric Kinsherf advised the board that certified free cash is estimated at approximately $2 million, down from $3 million last year after accounting for student transportation, snow and ice deficits, and other commitments. With roughly $950,000 in proposed warrant articles drawing on free cash, the town projects carrying approximately $1 million into May Town Meeting. Kinsherf also reported that $160,000 in state snow and ice reimbursement has been allocated and will be placed in a special revenue fund upon receipt.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

With classes opening Wednesday, the Halifax School Committee convened Monday to address personnel agreements, administrative appointments, and district operational updates. Principal Brian Prehna outlined a productive summer that saw the district rebound from initial budget strains thanks to a $200,000 town allocation. The restored funding enabled the administration to assemble hiring committees and secure three vital general education educators: Elizabeth Carnes in grade 2, Melissa Campanini in grade 5, and Nicole Kelly for grade 6 math and science. Prehna emphasized that filling these roles was essential to accommodating class sizes across grade levels, including a third grade cohort of 92 students and a second grade cohort of 82 students.

“So, adding on to those teachers was absolutely crucial and critical to supporting our kids this year moving forward.” — Brian Prehna

The committee formally approved an open-session employment contract for new Assistant Principal Casey Bailey, who started her responsibilities in July. Officials also ratified a one-year Memorandum of Agreement with the Halifax Teachers Association (HTA) and approved a renewed Memorandum of Understanding with the Halifax Police Department to govern the School Resource Officer (SRO) program. Superintendent Jill Proulx noted that while local police continue rebuilding department staffing, school leaders hope to have the SRO present in the building as frequently as last school year.

Read more

Subscribe now

The Full Story

What was scheduled as an open public hearing to evaluate Verizon New England Inc.’s cable television renewal license quickly turned into a class in municipal oversight when the Selectboard discovered that no physical contract or packet materials had been delivered to the board or made available to the public.

Miranda Cecil, an associate attorney with town counsel KP Law appearing remotely on behalf of lead counsel Nicole Costanzo, presented an executive summary of the negotiated renewal terms. Under the proposed five-year agreement, Duxbury would secure the maximum allowable 5% of Verizon’s gross annual revenue to support local public, educational, and government (PEG) access channels, alongside an upfront capital grant of $90,000 paid out over five annual installments of $18,000. By comparison, the town’s 2020 renewal provided a $45,000 capital grant alongside the same 5% revenue agreement.

Town Manager René Read interjected early in the presentation to note that neither town officials nor residents had access to the contract text. “The problem is the public doesn’t know because the board doesn’t know either,” Read noted, recommending that the board defer action until complete documentation could be distributed.

Board members voiced sharp concerns over the broader structural shift toward cord-cutting and streaming services. Member Michael McGee emphasized that the 5% revenue cut is shrinking in real value as households abandon traditional cable packages for online apps. While Cecil noted that the $90,000 capital grant is not tied to subscriber volume—making it a more stable funding stream—McGee requested historical and regional comparisons from surrounding South Shore towns to confirm whether the offer was truly competitive.

Vice-Chair Fernando Guitart pressed legal counsel on how competition operates in a market where Comcast also provides cable service in Duxbury. Cecil explained that under the Federal Cable Communications Act, cable licensing is not an open competitive bidding process; instead, terms secured in the Verizon agreement establish an ascertainment baseline that Comcast (whose current license expires in 2031) will theoretically be pressured to match or exceed.

Selectboard member Brian Glennon highlighted the legal hearing notice published in the Duxbury Clipper, which explicitly stated the hearing’s purpose: assessing whether Verizon is in full compliance with its current license and identifying the town’s future cable-related needs. When discussion turned to the scope of public testimony, Guitart insisted that a Verizon corporate representative be required to attend the continued hearing in person.

“[I]f people are going to be now fully understanding what this is the opportunity is, I request that we have a Verizon representative present in the room so they can take any feedback from the public directly and respond to it...” — Fernando Guitart, Vice-Chair

Counsel agreed to coordinate attendance with Verizon, and the board voted 5-0 to continue the hearing to September 14 at 6:45 p.m.

Read more